EGYPTIAN v. BIBLICAL TIME

UPDATED MAY 17, 2026. 4:31 P.M.

BIBLICAL CHRONOLOGY begins with the calculation of longevities from Adam forward. Thus, by Ussher's reckoning, we arrive at a date of 4004 BC for The Creation. Yet in the prehistoric myths of Egypt, Ptah (T.G.A.O.T.U.) had already been the God of creation for more than 7,494 years!

The fault of Biblical Chronology lay in the absurd temerity of the so-call Chosen-Ones tracing their genealogy to the first man created by God --- which unbeknownst to them was an unrealistic time-line --- then also attempting to reinvent the origin of nations. That mistake eventually provided scholars with the proof needed to expose this stage of Biblical History for the fraud it was, because they were able to produce evidence that these nations existed long before Noah and his sons. Abydos, for example, has grave sites dating to predynastic times (c. 4000 - 3500 BC); the same city in which was unearthed that artifact depicting a standard of the god Iah, even at that early period. Further archaeological discoveries confirmed that this primitive biblical history existed in a realm of pure myth vis a vis the documented world of ancient Egypt. In Egypt, the demarcation between myth and true history was established with the unification of the 2 Lands (c. 3100 BC), about the same time as the death of Biblical Adam. However, Biblical time continued to journey upon its mythical route until the time of Abraham (c 2166 BC) --- who might be nothing but a fiction himself or, at best, a distorted legend.

But Moses' Ethiopian Wife, AHMOSE NEFERTARI, Is Nothing BUT The Truth!

Along with her husband, Ahmose I --- an HISTORICAL Moses --- they begin the commencement of Ancient Egypt's New Kingdom!

PTAH

Moses' ETHIOPIAN WIFE

Thus, I caution you to be wary of Faith Merchants who, by enchanting eloquence, seek to exploit the credulity of the academically ignorant, unscrupulously misinforming them through a seduction of ingenious lies. I sought a way to remedy the poisonous effects of such miseducation by devising an antidote that would reinvigorate common sense. But, alas, the frustrating irony of common sense is that it's the least prevalent among the common masses! And the longer they've been exposed to false reality, the more psychologically resistant they are to intellectual reorientation. There is indeed much truth in the cliché that "old dogs are incapable of new tricks". Nevertheless, I will not be dissuaded by the difficulties attending this task. I will cast light on the facts until the fictions are laid bare, even ever so darkly in the shadow of truth.

Anchor 1

Why do these so-called main-stream scholars persist in asserting the existence of people who can't be mathematically located on the timelines to which they have been variously ascribed? Why is such unprofessional conduct even tolerated by 'whomever' are vested with the authority to check it? Chronology is supposed to be a science of measuring time, determining the true dates of past events, and arranging them in their correct sequential order. It's supposed to ENSURE that occurrences are placed within a proper VERIFIED timeline. What's more --- and what these mainstream scholars appear to ignore --- is that speciic aspects of cronology are directly governed and correlated by fundamental laws of physics which dictate what sequence of events are possible, impossible, or merely probable, ensuring that the universe operates in a logical, non-contradictory manner (or as we say, "according to Ma'at"). The 2 most important laws are (1) No 2 separate events can occupy the same space at the same time, and (2) For causally linked events, the cause must precede the effect. Every consensus thus far arrive at by the Bible-Archaeological scholars have been blatant violations of these laws.
[Case in point: When Josephus cited Manetho, then identified the Hyksos as the "Ancestors" of the Israelites, this identification became the 'consensus' --- even though Manetho's account was in sharp contrast to EVERY Biblical narrative of the bondage and subsequent exodus of Israel! And it REMAINED a consensus for approximately 1,800 years! Until the tomb of Admiral Ahmose, Son of Ebana, was discovered and the 'contradictions' were afterwards too publicized to deny. But why did it have to take that long? Because certain people just couldn't accept the possibility that the Bible story was a myth? That's a rabid kind of desperation, extending far beyond the point of patheticism. Yet, even after the tomb of Ahmose, Son of Ebana, was decrypted, those so-called scholars STILL failed to make a cognitive connection between the CONTEXTUAL similarity of the 2 narratives: Both containing an emphasis on the names "Yah" and "Mose(s)"!
All they had to do was apply the rules of chronology.

(1) A man called Jacob is renamed Israel. [NOTE: The first 'coincident' (or highly probable Empirical Nexus) is the attestation of a S.I.P. King by the name of Yakub-Har]. (2) He sought after God at Bethel (Gen. 28:10); or he found him in "The house of On" (Hosea 12:4). (3) His son, Joseph, is thrown into a pit by jealous brothers. He's eventually pulled from the pit by Midianites (Gen. 37:28) who sold him for 20 pieces of silver to Ishmaelites, who in turn transport him by camel to Egypt, where he is sold to Potiphar. (4) A Hebrew clan of 70 souls seek refuge in Egypt during a famine (Gen. 46:27; Ex. 1:5). From the expulsion of the Hyksos to the arrival of the 3600 Hebrew prisoners of war, is approximately 4 or 5 generations. "But in the 4th generation they shall come hither again; for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full." (Gen. 15:16). [NOTE: The second 'coincident' (or highly probable Empirical Nexus) is a contemporary inscription describing the "taking of 70 prisoners to the stronghold of Amun". Amun's stronghold was located in Thebes, which is also known as the Southern On. And Amenhotep II was its God & Ruler!. Clearly, the Joseph story is a complete fiction, contrived only as a transitional episode to explain how characters got from point A (the "Yakub-Har" story) to point B (the "Bondage" story). which was actually a "Prisoner of War" story.

TO BE CONTINUED ....