1.  I make a distinction between a living Pharaoh (Horus) and one that has deceased (an Osiris).  Both are gods, but it's the living Pharaoh, as a biological entity, that is (in theory) a material manifestation of a divine and transcendental force (Neter); Exhibit A3 is a prime example of this!.  And this was NOT in reference to the Biblical Moses, but to the 'human' one (for how can a fictitious creation be an actual human?).   While the human Moses is associated with Mes  ("being born" or "coming into being/existence"), the Biblical figure remains he who had been "drawn from the water" [a completely fictitious name, and one that would have never  been used by a native Egyptian: Pharaoh's daughter (Ex. 2:10)].  So when AI says "main stream scholars view Moses' name as indeed  Egyptian,"  those main stream scholars are indeed  in error, because there is no Egyptian name/word spelt 'Moses' that literally or even symbolically means "drawn from the water" (see 5 below) .  It probably would have been better for me to have said "a biological extension of a transcendental force," but for the sake of euphony and shorter brevity I preferred "Bio-Transcendental Extension".  As a living god, or son of god, would not Jesus be defined in the same light?  He (Jesus) was flesh and blood (biological) yet divine in his nature as being an extension of (or one with) his Divine/Heavenly Father.  Perhaps this moment will find me clever enough to kill a flock  of birds with one stone!  For I did not say that ALL Moses were 'literary concepts' --- only the biblical one.  A fiction, I said, yet a fiction that was modeled after one or more historical  figures.  One of these historical figures was definitely Ah-Mose(s), first king of the 18th Dynasty.  How did I reach this conclusion?  Through diligent research and cross-referencing!  The very first extra-Biblical allusion to the Exodus (according to Josephus) was made by Manetho, when he (Manetho) gave an account of the Hyksos, and how a renegade priest of Heliopolis named Osarsiph joined them, later changing his name to Moses.  If we equate this Osarsiph-Moses with the Biblical Moses, then at some point he must "perform miracles in the field of Zoan" (Ps. 78:12).  For more than 1300 years, ALL of you so-called Biblical Scholars took Josephus' word at face value.  Then came the great disillusionment when the Rosetta Stone was finally deciphered.  It was then proven that Zoan was a real  place, that it had also been the nome used as the capitol for the Hyksos and, most intriguing of all, that it was originally built by a Black Egyptian king!  But then no one seemed willing to accept the fact that, historically (as opposed to biblically), it was the Egyptian King who initiated their expulsion from Egypt, and not some Hebrew Levite who demanded  that Pharaoh should cut them loose.  We know the name of the Hyksos king (Kamudi) who was driven out of Egypt, and the name of the king (Ah-mose) who drove  him out (through  the field of Zoan no doubt)! 

​

3.  Composition by multiplicity; or the Biblical Moses (though a fiction himself) representing a 'composite portrait' of 'actual' historical personages, was the primary premise upon which my Theophoric Theory was formulated.  Once you notice the similarity of the 'unique' experiences between the Biblical Moses and certain Egyptian kings, you soon realize that the only distinguishing factor between them is the absence of a theophoric in the name of the former [(see 2).  That the extraction of the theophoric is a deliberate act becomes apparent.  The only questions left to answer is "when?" & "by whom?"].  Once this correlation between the 'fictional' & 'historical' is perceived, it allows for the outcome-predictability necessary to prove a hypothesis [like a 'key' for solving mysteries,  such as the one concerning Moses' Ethiopian wife (and even more complex narratives like the indignation of Moses' siblings towards his Ethiopian wife. See explanation 7 below)].  This I have accomplished, thus acquiring the means of distinguishing between fact and fiction in the Biblical OT Narrative.  Though I promote "Advanced" Bible Study, the method employed in KTT is too straightforward to merit the label "esoteric" (see 6 below). Once you read my Theophoric Theory, you will see how Un-complicated it really is, and your eyes will become opened as well.​

​

By dropping the theophorics (see 2 above & 5 below), it became impossible to distinguish one Egyptian king from the next, thereby effectively concealing the true identity of them all --- unless, of course, you possessed a pre-knowledge of the 'acts' committed by each of them.   And for those who were aware of, or responsible for, this concealment and kept it among themselves, shall we not say that they were privy to "a secret"? And whether the purpose of the concealment and revision of the true account was to form a nation or start a new religion, are they not both regarded as political actions?  If so, then any secrets pertaining to them are rightfully defined as political  ones.  Taken together, the result is simple logic. Yet that is not what I was referring to when I used the phrase "political secrets unawares", so it was taken completely out of context by AI!  For I was referring to the "Words of God" (Medu Neter/hieroglyphics) inscribed inside the pyramids of the Pharaohs.  Were these sacred words not meant for their Eyes Only?  And were not the only  people capable of reading them those who had been admitted/Initiated * into the House of Life?  (See 6 below).  And the House of Life was the *initial step  on the career path in a political system we've come to refer to as The-ocracy.​

​

And finally 4.   Have I ever given you so-called "Main Stream" scholars the least  impression that I am seeking your validation or accreditation?  You are right to say that my Theophoric Theory is not recognized by "your kind"; because it is, in fact, the first time you have EVER seen anything like it.  ORIGINAL Research!  So, please, don't insult me by even thinking  of reviewing my work.  You're not qualified.  Absolutely NO Peer of mine!  I'm not doing this for your approval; I'm doing it to EXPOSE you --- for the Pseudo-Bible scholars you really are.  It's been over 1000 years and you still haven't figured it out.  More than 1000 years and you're still  chasing ghosts.

​

Just wait until the RIGHT Rappers get possession of this theory, examine it from all angles, and see that it's "Good Work, True Work, Square  Work!" .... Boy Oh Boy .... Change is coming!